"How dateable are you actually?"
Sixteen questions. The answers are not ranked in order, so guessing the "right" one is its own personality test. Answer how you'd actually behave, not how you'd describe it later.
Your answers never leave your browser. Only the result gets counted, so I can laugh at you weirdos in aggregate, never individually.
The Boyfriend Audit is the men's edition dateability test, and it is more revealing than it looks. Sixteen questions decide how dateable you actually are, but here's the catch: the answers aren't ranked in any obvious order, so the second you try to pick the right one, you've accidentally started a second, more honest personality test. Would someone genuinely want to date you, or would they just survive you for a season?
Some men come out as The Reason Group Chats Exist, the good news everyone screenshots. Plenty are a Certified Catch with a couple of asterisks. And a few learn their mom is the last person still convinced they're a catch. So are you a good boyfriend, really? No accounts, no sign-up, nothing saved, just sixteen questions and a verdict you can either grow from or aggressively rationalize. Most people do the second one.
Not a diagnosis. Not advice. Not admissible.
Made by one person. No logins, no answers stored.
If it ruined your afternoon, that was the point.
The Boyfriend Audit is the original test for how good a boyfriend you are, scoring attraction, relationship IQ, stability, and compatibility. It is the one that started the send-it-to-him trend.
It measures whether you are a genuine catch, a fixer-upper, or a future podcast episode about red flags. The number does not lie, even when he wants it to.
The original audit scores four categories:
Every answer shifts your score across four categories, and they average into one result from 0 to 100 with a matching tier. The original audit keeps it simple, four dimensions and one honest number. Answer how you actually behave, not how you would describe yourself.
This is for boyfriends who want a baseline and for the curious partners who send it over with no context. If the 2.0 version felt too harsh, start here.